Because The Story of Philosophy offers something no algorithm can replicate:
Undeterred, Durant and his wife, Ariel, mortgaged their home and self-published the book. It was a gamble of epic proportions. The initial print run was modest, but word of mouth exploded. By 1927, Simon & Schuster had picked it up, and The Story of Philosophy became the unexpected literary sensation of the decade. It was the first book to prove that the masses were hungry for wisdom—if only it were served without the dust of the lecture hall. When we speak of the "exclusive" nature of Durant’s work today, we are referring to several unique qualities that separate it from every other philosophical survey. 1. The Narrative Biographical Approach Unlike other histories that list doctrines and "-isms," Durant exclusively focuses on the philosopher as a living human being . He dedicates entire chapters to the lives of Plato, Aristotle, Francis Bacon, Spinoza, Voltaire, Kant, Schopenhauer, Herbert Spencer, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Henri Bergson. story of philosophy by will durant exclusive
This article provides an exclusive look at the genesis, impact, and enduring genius of The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant. The exclusive backstory of The Story of Philosophy is one of audacious defiance. In the early 1920s, Will Durant was a teacher at the Labor Temple School in New York, educating immigrants and blue-collar workers. He realized that his students craced wisdom, but they were terrified of Aristotle and Kant. Because The Story of Philosophy offers something no
And that is the exclusive secret of Will Durant’s masterpiece: It turns readers into philosophers. By 1927, Simon & Schuster had picked it
That urgency is exclusive to his era—and terrifyingly mirrored in our own.
In a world of exclusive content locked behind paywalls and algorithms, this book remains the most democratic act of intellectual generosity ever published. Durant gave away the keys to the kingdom of thought for the price of a single paperback.
Durant wrote during the Great Depression, the rise of fascism, and the shadow of atomic war. He was not a dispassionate historian; he was a man trying to save civilization from itself. He believed that if the average citizen understood the history of human thought, they would be less likely to fall for demagogues and dictators.