The central argument against the film is that it validates the idea of the "hysterical woman"—that female grief is inherently dangerous and that women are closer to violent, savage nature than men. Von Trier feeds this fire in the film’s epilogue, where hundreds of faceless, unnamed women march toward the male protagonist as he lays wounded.
This leads to a series of escalating, graphic mutilations. When He tries to escape, She bludgeons him unconscious. In the two most notorious scenes in modern cinema, She crushes his testicles with a wooden block, then masturbates him until he ejaculates blood. When he finally wakes up, she has drilled a hole into his calf, attached a heavy grindstone, and screwed it into the flesh. movie antichrist 2009
Critics call this "torture porn" or "gross-out arthouse." But within the context of the film, it is the literal manifestation of a grief so profound that it destroys the body. You cannot write about the movie Antichrist 2009 without addressing the firestorm of feminist critique. When the film screened at Cannes, it received a special "anti-prize" for its misogyny. Roger Ebert called it "a particularly extreme exercise in audience abuse." The central argument against the film is that
As He tries to rationally psychoanalyze his wife, the natural world fights back. Animals appear not as cute companions, but as omens of chaos. She encounters a deer that carries an unborn, dead fawn. A fox stands on its hind legs, opens its mouth, and—in a moment of surreal horror—speaks, saying, "Chaos reigns." When He tries to escape, She bludgeons him unconscious
This devastating prologue is wordless, operatic, and cruel. It immediately establishes the film's thesis: There is no safety, not even in the most intimate moments.
In the final shot, we see She's body lying on the grass, her face peaceful. The camera holds on the shoes of the dead child, which are still under the cabin floorboards. Then, the forest erupts in a chaotic, silent wind.